|
Comments
on Current Events
SPACEPORT

"
I want to go to a planet where they don't allow annoying block adds
on radio or TV."
"I
want to go to a planet that doesn't conduct political polls."
"I
want to go to a planet where election campaigns are limited to one
month (or less)."
"I
want to go to a planet where murder is called murder and not choice."
"I
want to go to a no smoking planet."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't have a “no questions asked”
return policy."
"I
want to go to a planet where speed laws are used to protect people
and not be used as a back-door tax."
"I
want to go to a planet where you can't block your telephone number
from identification devices."
"I
want to go to a planet where citizenship is based on one's
understanding of the Bible and knowledge of God."
"I
want to go to a planet where it doesn't matter if Adam had a belly
button or not."
"I
want to go to a planet where there is separation of Pope and Media."
"I
want to go to planet where there are no credit cards."
"I
want to go to a planet where there are two Americas."
"I
want to go to a planet where judges and lawyers aren't allowed to
own stock in any companies that run or supply prisons."
"I
want to go to a planet where buffet is spelled like it sounds."
"I
want to go to a planet where i doesn't follow e."
"I
want to go to a planet where no one says, Oh my God! every time
they turn around, or in sit-coms or win lotteries."
"I
want to go to a planet where they have separation of politics and
Oscar."
"I
want to go to a planet where everyone has to write legibly."
"I
want to go to a planet where basketball actually has an end of the
season."
"I
want to go to a planet where retired people don't drive into town
for coffee at 45 mph."
"I
want to go to a planet where liberals can “read my lips."
"I
want to go to a planet where “gay” is a four-letter word."
"I
want to go to a planet where radio isn't just an excuse for commercials."
"I
want to go to a planet where insurance companies don't exist."
"I
want to go to a planet where there are no mosquitoes or skunks."
"I
want to go to a planet where there are no lawyers."
"I
want to go to a planet where there are two roadway systems: one
for those paid by the hour and one for those paid by the mile."
"I
want to go to a planet where there is no tenure."
"I
want to go to a planet where planes don't land in buildings."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't have unnamed sources for
critical news stories."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't have fast-talking disclaimers
at the end of radio and TV commercials."
"I
want to go to a planet where imbeciles with cell phones have to
use their cruise controls or pull off the road."
"I
want to go to a planet where Republicans have actual spines."
"I
want to go to a planet where there is no Madison Avenue."
"I
want to go to a planet where there is no such thing as a two-lane
road."
"I
want to go to a planet where there are no gullible people."
"I
want to go to a planet where slavery is used as a punishment for
all those who can't handle freedom and not based on race, creed
or color."
"I
want to go to a planet where capital punishment isn't considered
cruel and unusual."
"I
want to go to a planet where animals are not considered to be equal
to humans."
"I
want to go to a planet where drivers that don't intend to pass the
car ahead will stay back 300 feet out of common courtesy so others
can."
"I
want to go to a planet where town bypasses are the rule rather than
the exception or better yet, where no towns can be built on through
highways."
"I
want to go to a planet where (in the northern regions) trees and
building sites can't be placed closer than 1/4 of a mile to any
roadway."
"I
want to go to a planet where there are no schools on any main throughfare."
"I
want to go to a planet where people walking their dogs don't let
them crap on someone else's lawn."
"I
want to go to a planet where there are no Byrds (Robert C.)."
"I
want to go to a planet where the people know the difference between
capital punishment and abortion and what God authorizes and doesn't."
"I
want to go to a planet where taggers are sent back to earth."
"I
want to go to a planet where kidnapping, child molesting, murdering
perverts have fewer tights than their victims."
"I
want to go to a planet where child molesting, murdering perverts
will be punished down here before God gets a hold of them."
"I
want to go to a planet where all the people support our troops especially
when they are killing tyrants and bullies."
"I
want to go to a planet where independence isn't considered isolationism."
"I
want to go to a planet where different races are happy with who
they are and happy with each other."
"I
want to go to a planet where you eat what you grow and the other
guy 14,000 miles away eats what he grows without all the import/export
transportation costs involved in swapping the same food products
back and forth with each other."
"I
want to go to a planet where police don't have to use the word “allegedly”
when describing cold-blooded killers caught in the act."
"I
want to go to a planet where there is no ACLU."
"I
want to go to a planet where liars will be punished before God gets
a hold of them."
"I
want to go to a planet where radio commercials don't contain music
or cell ring sounds."
"I
want to go to a planet where you have to be a truck driver before
you can become a cop."
"I
want to go to a planet where you have to be a cop and a truck driver
before you can become a civil engineer."
"I
want to go to a planet where littering is unthinkable."
"I
want to go to a planet where you have to be a garbage man before
you can become a citizen."
"I
want to go to a planet where only the innocent are presumed innocent."
"I
want to go to a planet where the Constitution is consistent with
the Bible."
"I
want to go to a planet where there are realistic speed limits."
"I
want to go to a planet where people use their turn signals."
"I
want to go to a planet where the “other America” is."
"I
want to go to a planet where God is more popular than Santa."
"I
want to go to a planet where people believe in God more than Santa."
"I
want to go to a planet where people pray to God and not Santa."
"I
want to go to a planet where people treat God as God not Santa."
"I
want to go to a planet where they never heard of Santa."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't feel compelled to drink
beer at every softball tournament or every tailgate party."
"I
want to go to a planet where dead people can't vote."
"I
want to go to a planet where no patents are needed."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't have a Highway 86 (local
Iowa joke)."
"I
want to go to a planet where Christians use their Bibles as a guide
to life."
"I
want to go to a planet where smokers won't say, “Why me Lord."
"I
want to go to a planet where no one ever heard, “Oh, my god."
"I
want to go to a planet where news people present the news and not
try to make it."
"I
want to go to a planet where a social engineer isn't a news reporter."
"I
want to go to a planet where people know the difference between
separation of church and state and separation of God and state."
"I
want to go to a planet where people don't drink and drive."
"I
want to go to a planet where commercials don't repeat the phone
number three times in rapid succession."
"I
want to go to a planet where people that kill others by suicide
don't think they receive seven virgins when they get to paradise."
"I
want to go to a planet where virgins aren't used as bait to get
desperate people to blow up other people."
"I
want to go to a planet where suicide isn't thought of as an easy
escape."
"I
want to go to a planet where suicide is known as the impossible
dream."
"I
want to go to a planet where they know the difference between the
Passover Lamb and the Easter ham."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't call alcoholism a disease."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't call drug addiction a disease."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't call over-eating a disease."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't call gambling a disease."
"I
want to go to a planet where obesity isn't called a disease or a
handicap."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't call the results of sin
a disease."
"I
want to go to a planet where people that call themselves Christians
actually use and believe their Bibles."
"I
want to go to a planet where people don't leave shopping carts in
the middle of the parking lot."
"I
want to go to a planet where spouse abusers come with a warning
label, so they can be sent back to earth, or at least to the other
America."
"I
want to go to a planet where people that don't like the sound of
Jake brakes can't build a house by a highway on a steep hill."
"I
want to go to a planet where Jake brakes and straight pipes sold
together are illegal."
"I
want to go to a planet where housing projects can't be built along
side a noisy freeway."
"I
want to go to a planet where housing projects can't be built along
side an airport."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't use bait and hook sales
tactics on radio and TV."
"I
want to go to a planet where they remember Jesus 365 days a year."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't use God's name in vain and
then cry, “Why me Lord,” when something goes wrong."
"I
want to go to a planet where – if they celebrate Christmas, they
don't put out decorations in the stores and homes until after Thanksgiving."
"I
want to go to a planet where Mars isn't the solution to all of our
problems."
"I
want to go to a planet where it's understood that suicide isn't
the fast track to a better place."
"I
want to go to a planet where people that say they believe in the
true God don't want to kill everybody outside their own little group.
We had enough of that in the dark ages."
"I
want to go to a planet where people that are too afraid to drive
on the wet and snow covered roads, stay home."
"I
want to go to a planet where radio hasn't evolved into the two-person
slap and tickle morning show format."
"I
want to go to a planet where they can't promote TV shows on radio."
"I
want to go to a planet where they can't repeat the phone number
more that twice on TV and radio ads."
"I
want to go to a planet where they think less of the people creating
embryos than the ones that are carving them up in the name of health
research."
"I
want to go to a planet where if people are going to speed, it is
on the open highway and not through towns."
"I
want to go to a planet where no means no and yes means yes."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't encourage you to vote early
and vote often."
"I
want to go to a planet where people vote for morality and not just
their political party."
"I
want to go to a planet where it is easy to by-pass the legislature
when they are too cowardly or politically correct to enact laws
that protect people from wolves in sheep's clothing."
"I
want to go to a planet where love, truth and freedom aren't spelled
A-B-O-R-T-I-O-N."
"I
want to go to a planet where people know the difference between
wrestling and entertainment."
"I
want to go to a planet where people sell stuff for $8 rather than
$7.99."
"I
want to go to a planet where everybody expects dust to come out
of the rear of a combine."
"I
want to go to a planet where dust coming out of a farmer's combine
is accepted as normal."
"I
want to go to a planet where people stay home at night."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't raise pork in barrels."
"I
want to go to a planet where the Supreme Court can't give permission
to kill babies in the name of choice and women's rights."
"I
want to go to a planet where they don't allow fuzzy dice or handicapped
signs to hang on the rear view mirror."
"I
want to go to a planet where politicians are not allowed to lie."
"I
want to go to a planet where smoking is something your tires do
when you peel out."
"I
want to go to a planet where Christians don't use God's name in
vain."
"I
want to go to a planet where liberals are an endangered species
and nobody cares."
"I
want to go to a planet where they follow the American Constitution,
which allows slavery for people who can't handle freedom."
"I
want to go to a planet where they have an organization called: People
for the Ethical Treatment of Unborn Babies."
"I
want to go to a planet where they have an organization called: People
for the Ethical Treatment of Human Beings."
"I
want to go to a planet where they have an organization called, People
for the Ethical Treatment of Conservatives (especially by the media)."
"I
want to go to a planet where there is one bill, one vote."
"I
want to go to a planet where freedom fighters don't hide behind
women and children."
"I
want to go to a planet where insurance hasn't replaced God."
"I
want to go to a planet where people trust in God more than insurance."
"I
want to go to a planet where people have faith instead of insurance."
"I
want to go to a planet where kids that played Monopoly can't grow
up to handle other people's money."
"I
want to go to a planet where people know their financial limits."
"I
want to go to a planet where men want to be men and women want to
be women."
"I
want to go to a planet where Jesus can't be portrayed as exclusively
gentle."
"I
want to go to a planet where personal responsibility is law."
"I
want to go to a planet where liberals blame the abuser rather than
the product."
"I
want to go to a planet where people don't suck densely polluted
air into their lungs and call it pleasure."
"I
want to go to a planet where people don't snort powerful mind-altering
drugs into their noses and call it pleasure."
"I
want to go to a planet where people don't drink alcoholic beverages
until they puke and call it pleasure."
Spaceport
beginning
American
Way of Life
Flag
Burning
Intelligent
design vs. evolution
Is
the Iraqi war justified?
Is
there a connection between abortion and terrorism?
Lessons
from 911
Lessons
from Bob Jones University
THE
AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE
Just
what is the American way of life? One can only conclude it is that
which the government and courts have endorsed, created or allowed
– you know, like a country with open borders. Open borders threaten
the American way of life. When you have to close 78 hospitals (designed
to treat Americans who have taken ill and thereby give them a better
quality life) because their resources have been exhausted by border-jumpers
that get ill or are ill in the first place, and the U.S. Government
has passed a law that makes hospitals treat all who come through
their doors, thereby encouraging sick people from all over the world
to come into this country for essentially free treatment – tied
to the fact that we have open borders – just what do you think is
going to happen? Compassion and open borders are a bad combination
and the height national and of fiscal irresponsibility.
When
we talk about the attack on America from Al-Qaeda, let's not forget
the attack from Mexico, and other South American countries and any
other citizen from any other country who is following the call of
Emma Lazarus, which was attached to the Statue of Liberty and reads
in part:
“Give
me your tired, your poor,
Your
huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The
wretched refuse of your teaming shore,
Send
these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I
lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
When
I was in school, we were taught to revere these words and now, because
of government ineptitude (from both parties), those words have become
a curse to this nation. The Statue of Liberty has in effect become
a Trojan horse. The greatness of this nation, with its open borders
are like a magnet to all those living in countries that are run
even worse than our own. Who in their right mind wants to live in
a Third World cesspool run by tyrants and dictators only interested
in lining their own pockets all the while keeping their citizens
from the success that we enjoy? And if this invasion of America
keeps up, we will turn into a Third World cesspool and fall onto
the scrap pile of history as have many other once great nations
after they got stupid. But in the meantime, don't worry – we aren't
being run by tyrants and dictators, we are being run by the inept,
that “we the people” elect. We get the government we deserve. Don't
get me wrong; the problem isn't in our participation in free and
open elections or in the stars, “The fault, dear Brutus, is in ourselves.”
back
to top
FLAG
BURNING
The
flag represents the best hopes and desires of the country for its
people and none more than the United States of America. The only
reason that that mission or desire could possibly change is because
the people change. It is not the soil or the mountains that make
a nation great – it's the people.
The
nation is a barrel and the citizens are but apples within it. The
flag is a physical representation of a great ideal as it started
out but as the citizens rot from within, the makeup and disposition
of the rest of the apples as well as the barrel itself, comes into
question. I find it ironic that the rotting apples seem to be the
first ones that don't like the conditions in the barrel and want
“some kind” of change - now.
A
citizen who burns the flag should be considered a person without
a country because they, who would dare to burn the flag, attack
the foundational ideals upon which this nation was founded and fail
to attack the real cause of the nation's failure – moral decay and
not heeding the Ten Commandments.
back
to top
INTELLIGENT
DESIGN VS. EVOLUTION
In
all this talk about separation of church and state and intelligent
design vs. evolution, I can't recall anyone worrying about separation
of atheist and state or even secularist and state and the billions
of tax dollars given to liberal educational institutions and even
NASA (who plays both ends against the middle) to find out where
we came from.
As
I look back in history I see a time that “they” didn't like being
left out of the educational process either and it came to a head
in the “Scopes Monkey Trial” in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925. Their
ulterior motive in spending all those tax dollars was to prove that
everything came from nothing and trying to socially engineer us
away from belief in the existence of God.
Concerning
the matter of creation of the universe – I say, you can't get something
from nothing, no matter how long you wait, you'd still have to wait,
like forever.
If
we were to go back in time before anything existed and stare at
a little spot in the middle of all that non-existence, how long
would it take before any elementary particles showed up? And just
how would they show up in the first place? If I can't use the word
miracle they can't use scientific terms like: quantum mechanics,
uncertainty principle, singularity this or singularity that. Those
terms are just another word(s) for miracle. For everything to come
out of nothing all by itself even over billions of years is more
than a major miracle. We Christians get laughed at when we say miracle
but when they say, quantum mechanics, uncertainty principle, singularity
this or singularity that, they get Nobel Prizes and lots of money.
We have let them get away with their highbrow snobbery for long
enough. Education without common sense is next to worthless.
In
all honesty I can't really complain about all the money they spent
to find out where we came from because in trying to find it out
and to disprove the existence of God they have proven how
we came into existence. No matter how the elementary particles got
there and whomever or whatever stirred, glommed or otherwise manipulated
those particles (quarks, electrons, protons and neutrons) that make
up atoms, which make up molecules, which make up elements and chemicals,
which make up us, they are there and those facts in that order can't
be argued. “They” say “nothing” did it; I say God did it.
Intelligent
design doesn't promote religion; it promotes a belief in the God
that gives all of us every heartbeat and every breath of
life we breathe and was responsible for the creation we see around
us every day. It puts the name of God on the act of creation. If
that truth offends the non-believers – that's too bad, because their
“truth” offends the majority and the majority should not have to
fund “Fantasy Island” or the search for it. Even if there were no
God, the Ten Commandments are a good idea for all peoples of all
countries. What's wrong with not stealing or robbing, or lying or
any of the rest? Only a fool would support lawlessness. If everybody
lived the Golden Rule, life would be good even after a hurricane,
tornado, earthquake, tsunami, fire or whatever would come along.
back
to top
LESSONS
FROM 911
Concerning
the Twin Tower and Pentagon attacks:
Why
do these things happen? Who do we blame? Do we really want the answer?
There are answers and the best hope of understanding
the reason can be found in the Bible. People that have never read
or seldom read the Bible will never understand what I am saying
here. All they can say or think is; how could a God of love ever
allow this to happen?
I
want you to notice that I have included myself in this paper. I
have sins and weaknesses and human frailties just like anybody else
but am trying to limit my offenses against God as He gives me light.
I have been reading and studying the Bible for over thirty years.
Those subsequent years of Bible study have helped me to turn away
from things that are wrong and has taught me to ask forgiveness
when I do sin.
I
understand that Jerry Falwell says the finger of blame for this
disaster points directly to the gays and other devout sinners in
this country. I have to partially agree with him but would like
to add a few names (including my own) to that list. I would also
put Jerry's name on that list and add to it, Jim and Tammy Bakker,
Jimmy Swaggart and all the Elmer Gantry's of this country and even
all of the Billy Graham's and the Pope's. What do some of these,
as well as the everyday citizen have in common that could possibly
cause God to allow or even direct this attack on these most significant
institutions of this country? Abortions, Santa Clause, the Easter
Bunny, Halloween, breaking God's Sabbath (not the Jewish Sabbath
of the Law that Christ fulfilled) but the Sabbath that God observed
just after the six days of creation. I think this list can include
anyone who hangs a picture of Jesus on the wall in their house or
church, not knowing what He looks like. And the most important of
all, using God's name in vain. The Bible says they which do such
will not be held guiltless. With that guilt comes judgment that
may come in this life as well as the next.
Do
we who pray to God one minute and then turn around and ask God to
“damn” this and “Jesus Christ” that the next minute, think we are
innocent? Using God's name in vain used to be illegal in this country
but thanks to, ”freedom of speech,” those laws are laughed off the
books by not being enforced. Well, we're not going to laugh this
disaster off any time soon, no matter who or what is to blame. The
people who did this have no regard for the Constitution and people
that make up liberal organizations like the ACLU are aiding the
bravado of these Kamikaze cowards.
I
wonder how many of the people that invoked the name of God and asked
for His help and blessing through this matter, ever read their Bibles.
I wonder how many of those same people use God's name in vain and
support abortion and/or have even had an abortion? You ask, what
could this possibly have to do with anything? It is the same God,
which we have all prayed and cried out to, concerning the horror
of this attack, that gives each and every one of us every breath
we breathe and every heart beat. Us includes all
forms of life. When we presume to remove His spirit from any of
His creatures, without His permission (as in the case of animals
for food and people for capital crimes), can we be held guiltless?
How can all those thousands of people killed in these cowardly attacks
be so precious to us (who we don't know) and all the multiplied
millions of aborted babies mean so little. Well guess what? They
all mean something to God and anyone who
supports the right to kill babies, stands at odds with God. If the,
here and now, of everyday judgment doesn't scare you, wait until
the next life.
Throughout
biblical history God has frequently used the ungodly to punish his
people and bring them back to Himself and His way of thinking. Who
has more right to do that than God? If He created the heavens and
the earth and if He then created mankind in His own image, He certainly
has the power and the right to do whatever he wants, no matter what
we think. Remember! Our ways are not His ways.
Those
well planned and for the most part, carried out attacks could have
only happened with God's allowance and/or His permission or direction.
The most humbled and relieved people of all should be those who
work in the Capitol building. If one of those planes was truly targeted
at the capitol and failed to get there, it also fits the biblical
pattern of the people suffering worse than the leaders of their
country, such as the case of King David numbering the people without
God's permission. Seventy thousand died as a result of that intrusion
into God's space, but David lived on.
When
we say these (which would include all of us) are innocent people,
we presume too much. “We have all sinned and come short of the glory
of God.” There are some more guilty than others. They of the Twin
Towers and Pentagon are the banner carriers of us all. There were
some righteous and some unrighteous that died there. That's why
we should all take it personally, but not unto shaking our
fist at God, but dropping to our knees as most of us have done.
When we ask, why? Let's be ready to hear the answer. If we all had
our noses in the Bible as much as we do the sports or business pages,
we would see, for example, that profaning the name of God with swearing,
and calling pagan holidays, Holy, are materialistic and worldly
habits that should be avoided. Most of what we seem to be doing
in the name of God, can't be justified by scripture.
This
should be a wake up call for all of us. We have been warned. As
in Sodom and Gomorrah, the righteous would have died with the unrighteous
had not the angels brought them out by the hand, with much haste
I might add. Let us take the hand of God (through His Word) and
be led to safety in the future.
back
to top
IS
THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN ABORTION AND TERRORISM?
God
is love, God is truth, God is light, God is life. His Spirit is
the energy that gives every living thing life and to remove that
life without God's permission as in the case of abortion is a very
dangerous act. He gives mankind permission to execute our fellow
man when he has shed innocent blood, He gives us permission to kill
animals and cut down plants and trees for their obvious uses; but
I find nowhere in the Bible where we have “His” permission to send
His Spirit back to Him by killing babies through such noble sounding
phrases as; women's rights, choice, it's my body, etc. The Supreme
Court makes abortion legal – God in us makes abortion illegal and
ill advised.
The
Bible also says, when your ways please the Lord, He will make even
your enemies to be at peace with you. Proverbs 16:7. The opposite
of that would seem to be, if your ways didn't please the Lord He
would give your enemies power over you. Wouldn't it be ironic if
God raised up a terrorist (enemy) for every baby we aborted?
Over
ten years ago I stated: “In the long line of historical “isms,”
terrorism would be the next to the last “ism.”” Until we can reign-in
terrorists, no one is safe from any assortment of attacks upon this
nation and its people as well as the people and nations of the world.
The only thing that can even come close to regulating terrorism
is to register every person on the earth and know what they buy
and where they go.
This
will be the tactic of the last “ism.” It also can be read about
in the Bible: Revelation 13:1-18 in general and 16-18, specifically.
On the outside, this regulation would seem to be a good thing but
when you look a little deeper it will be the death-nail for freedom
of religion. The religious secularists will finally get their wish
and the world will have one religion and that's the good news. The
bad news is that it isn't God's version.
Don't
get me wrong – abortion is only one part of societies eventual slide
to oblivion. We are doing all kinds of things that don't fit God's
ideals and will have to be answered for, and all the social programs
in all the world won't bail us out of our problems. If there is
any truth to Proverbs 16:7, the author of our troubles isn't any
further away from us than our next heartbeat.
P.S.
Get a load of vs.15 (Rev 13:15 KJV). I, Robot will become a reality.
back
to top
LESSONS
FROM BOB JONES UNIVERSITY
This
letter was written to a talk show host in 2000:
I
was driving my truck when I heard your discussion on Bob Jones University's
racial policies. I didn't hear a lot of the program, so please forgive
me if I repeat someone's question/answer/thought. I normally agree
with you on most topics but your reaction to their dating
policy (even though I, believe it or not, share that view in reference
to dating) was surprised by the seeming one-sided intensity of your
reaction. I think that parents taking care where they send their
kids to school should be given credit. They obviously go along with
the school policy and should be respected for something we may not
see clearly.
Acting
as the “angle's” advocate - I think they (Bob Jones University)
are mostly guilty of nipping “it” in the bud. That is, dating can
lead to love and love can lead to, “guess who's coming to dinner,”
and that can lead to marriage. Parents are sending their children
there for an education, and the university, no doubt, is very sensitive
to the prejudices of the parents (right or wrong). After all, they
are in the south.
We
need to invent or find words other than prejudice, bigot and racist
that describe the act of embracing God's creation of the individual
races. A word that won't require an apology to a bunch of godless
politically correct hypocrites that (many of which) celebrate Christmas
but deny the real power of God. A word that describes people that
reflects a normal reaction of support for God's creation of the
individual races - that doesn't inspire shame and force people into
a closet. We need a word that honors those differences and says
that it's okay to remain just as God created us. People throw
those hate words around very freely and, in fact, it is its
own form of prejudice and fear mongering. Those words are a form
of intimidation and manipulation that insure the liberals get it
their way.
When
my Mom was in high school, her best friend was a black girl. Back
then when they (the Negroes) were ashamed of the word “black” (come
to think of it, that was even a form of prejudice used against those
that knew they were black and proud of it, but I digress). One day
my brother and I were a couple of houses up the street (in Quartz
Hill, California) visiting with a lady that moved there from Tennessee.
We came home saying, nigger this and nigger that. My Mom's reaction
was swift and stern but loving. We never said nigger again. To the
best of my knowledge my Mom never dated a black man, and I don't
think would have ever married one. Does that make her a racist,
bigot or a prejudiced person? My brother had a black girl friend
for a while and I don't recall any negative reaction on Mom's part.
Is
Bob Jones a bigot for observing that difference, and whatever plan
God had for dividing the races the way He did? If God wanted all
the races to be one, He would have created them that way. Bob Jones
has two obligations: One is to consider what God did in the first
place (by creating the different races) in case it does matter.
And the other is to insure that the parents who may have a prejudice,
in favor of the way God did it, and ask for support in what they
believe (right or wrong) because the parents are probably paying
the student's way through the college and they have the right (right
or wrong) to have their student in the racial situation they want
them in, and not worry about who's coming to dinner somewhere down
the road. If they feel God, in all His wisdom, skill and Divine
right, created the different races, and there is nothing wrong with
keeping them the same, why should anyone give them a bad time about
their belief? Make no mistake; there are plenty of people of color
that think the same way. We only hear about the whites that advocate
non-mixing. It makes better press, because they are punishing the
whites for slavery even though the blacks sold their brothers into
slavery in the first place.
As
far as I'm concerned, if you are of age you can choose the date
or the mate you want. If it doesn't make any difference to God,
it shouldn't make any difference to any one else either. They (the
parents) have a right to expect that the school is not promoting
something they don't approve of. If blending the races does
make a difference to God, then look out! I believe, where it makes
an immediate difference is, when people start mandating a change
from the status-quo just because they think it is the right thing
to do. Why don't we question their motivation? Who gives them the
right to push their ideas off on the rest of us? Why should anyone
be allowed to brow-beat, harass, bully, berate and shame anyone
into compliance (with their wishes) or pressuring them to keep their
mouth shut, if they think that race mixing is wrong. They (the race
mixing advocates) seem to think that God and the Constitution come
down on their side in any such liberal argument, including welfare,
abortion, capital punishment and all the rest. If you can somehow
squeeze out of the Constitution that it is okay to kill babies,
then in matters of opinion that don't draw blood, it should certainly
give the parents the right to be wrong when they advocate same race
marriages and even dating. We (conservatives) are the bad guys,
they (liberals) are the good guys, even though they want to keep
killers alive and kill innocent babies, but that's another story.
I
think people have the right to be prejudiced (there's that word
again) as long as they don't advocate or do violence against any
color “different” from their own. Who made the rule that you can't
differ on mixing the races? Certainly not God, and if we were to
follow His example in the creation of the different races, we would
be a little cautious in the promotion of race mixing. Putting God
aside for the moment, it is each persons right (Constitutional and
otherwise) to choose what they want to do in this regard. There
is no way that politically correct people or members of government
should be able shove their version of Constitutional rights down
the throats of anybody no matter what noble cause they call it.
Where is the people's Constitutional right to have the racial situation,
just as God set it up? This vigorous name-calling seems clearly
to be an attack on God's sovereignty.
There
are millions and millions of white people that treat people of color
with respect and dignity. They don't advocate any kind of violence;
they just don't want to cross that barrier.
Religiously
speaking, the Declaration of Independence is a joke. Are all people
created equal? We say all people are endowed by their creator with
certain unalienable rights, on the one hand and we realize on the
other, we know that some of the framers of the Constitution owned
slaves. So much for created equal and unalienable rights. Rights
only applied to the whites as far as the framers were concerned.
No one should argue that the interpretation should be applied to
all races (even though some will and do argue). They (the framers)
also didn't realize that if God gives rights, He could also take
them away, if the people (no matter what color) do things that He
doesn't like. He can use another nation, famine and pestilence to
curse the people that fall out of His favor. He has the ultimate
right to do what He wants in reference to His creation and judgment.
The Declaration of Independence as understood by the average lawyer
takes away God's right to be Lord and Master over that which He
created, but this is another topic.
If
the university is guilty of “nipping it in the bud,” where does
this innocent “oneness,” stop? Are we to have and accept one world
government? Are we to have one religion? Are we to have one language?
This next part is borrowed from a chapter of my book, Conspiracy
of Judgment on this web site. As you will be able to tell,
it goes back several years but it makes a strong point:
Years
ago I thought the news media used to be out to get the conservatives.
After Jimmy Carter was in office I could see that liberals were
fair game also. After many years of observation I have come to the
conclusion that they are out after "anyone" in authority.
They will attack anyone from the President right down to the small
town police chief.
I
asked myself what are they looking for? A man perfect in beauty?
(Ezk 28:12) A man that doesn't desire women? (Dan 11:37) A man wiser
than Daniel of old? (Ezk 28:3) A man with the wisdom of the ages?
(Ezk 28:13) A wise and cunning business man? (Ezk 28:4-5) A man
perfect in his ways? (Ezk 28:15) A man that all religions can live
with? A man that will seem as a god to a lost and wayward people?
A man that can make the world one through flatteries and treaties?
A man that can make "We Are The World" a reality? A man
that will answer the cry of Seals and Crofts, "One World Now?"
A man that will join John Lennon in enlisting "All The People"
to "Imagine" a world living as one?
They
are looking for a champion, a modern day Nimrod, and a return to
the Tower of Babel. They are looking for none other than the Antichrist,
who the Bible predicts will rule in the last days.
See:
"Lucifer," Isa. 14:12, "the little horn," Dan.
7:8; 8:9, "the king of fierce countenance," Dan. 8:23,
"the prince that shall come," Dan. 9:26, "the willful
king," Dan 11:36, "the man of sin," "the son
of perdition," "wicked one," 2 Thess. 2:3,8, "Antichrist,"
1 John 2:18, and "the beast," Rev. 13:1-10. (Content of
scripture references from Unger's Bible Dictionary)
Critics
of conservative government must be forgiven because they are simply
attempting to defend the last dying gasps of FDR-ism. The depression
was a judgment of God on the people of America. FDR got us out of
that which we deserved and we were grateful to him for it. Instead
of repenting and allowing God to restore our economy, he (FDR) bought
our way out of it.
Socialism
was a worldwide judgment. Its most brutal form showed itself as
full blown communism such as in Russia and China, and its most settle
form was that of FDR-ism that crept into America. In all forms,
it was people attempting to override God's judgment on the one hand
and have guaranteed security on the other, both then and in the
future - otherwise known as hedging their bets.
One
can even be sold to the bondage of extreme capitalism such as in
the days of Joseph in Pharaoh's Egypt. Pharaoh had a dream that
Egypt was going to go into a 7-year famine. Joseph revealed the
interpretation of the dream and was put in charge of the plan of
holding back one-fifth of each year's production of those 7 good
years so they could survive the 7 bad. The people seemed to let
the government save all the grain and when the famine hit and they
eventually used their own supplies then had to go to Joseph and
get more. First they mortgaged their
animals, then their land and eventually themselves. They were in
bondage, lock-stock-and barrel to Pharaoh. They trusted in government
and paid their tithe of grain just to be oppressed in the end with
their own grain. They could have avoided the whole thing if they
had just saved grain on their own, but they trusted in government.
The
point I'm trying to make here is - the liberal world is trying to
usurp God's authority and power over His creation. He created the
races, some people want one. He divided the languages at the tower
of Babel, some people want one. He created different kingdoms and
nations, some people want one. The world has many different types
of money; the common market nations want one.
The
people of this world will be begging for the one world government
someday. Their goal like John Lennon's and others; is to have no
borders, no possessions, one race, one language, and no religion
too, except for them of special talent or privilege.
Remember
when Jimmy Carter was blasted for his ethnic purity comment? We
have to remember that he was speaking of neighborhoods, not people.
The super sensitive news media really went ballistic. Kind of makes
you glad that they (the media) don't work for the postal
department, but that's another topic. The fact of the matter is,
you are either ethnically pure or you are not. Not many people in
this world are. Is it wrong to be ethnically pure, the way we were
originally created? If so, when did it become wrong? The blood in
my veins is German, English and Scottish. Am I any less human or
any less of a man?
To
not be ethnically pure is not a sin and should not be causing the
pain it seems to be causing. They (liberals) seem to advocate the
abolishment of God's contribution to creation by eliminating the
difference between people. They seem to want one huge gray mass
of humanity.
It
is a similar phenomenon to that of Communism. How could anyone want
to, or advocate living in the conditions that the common people
were living in, and call that a blessing, with a noble cause of
everyone being equal and eliminating the classes. Except for the
leaders of the Animal Farm, of course, but that's another topic.
Living
life in a one race, one language, one religion world, would be like
eating mush for three meals a day for the rest your life. No salt,
no pepper, no spice, just a bland nothingness.
The
real racists are the ones that are blending away the creation of
God into the gray or one color race. All this name-calling is a
cover up for the attempt of abolishing the individual races.
Another
word that is used by the politically correct for “crowd control”
is homophobe. They want to shame anyone that is against homosexuality,
into keeping their mouth shut. If a person is homophobic – what
is that phobia based on. Pure prejudice against the act of homosexuality
or the final results it brings about, such as Sodom and Gomorrah?
What phobia do you call it when you are in a boat with no power
on the upper reaches of the Niagara River? It's called a looming
disaster.
back
to top
IS
THE IRAQI WAR JUSTIFIED?
I'm
all for fighting for freedom but we need to pick our battles a little
better. Number one demands that the people want freedom as bad as
we want it for them. Number two demands that our helping them makes
sense. Bush calls Islam an honorable religion and even now we are
in Iraq defending the Muslim's right to defame Jesus as the Son
of God. That should offend all Christians – especially the ones
that celebrate the birth of Christ according to the Bible and even
the ones that accept the “traditional” man-made version known as
Christmas – both of which are an offense to Muslims. Either Jesus
is the Son of God or He isn't. If God made the world without a bag
of ingredients, then He could have a Son without having a wife,
as contended by the Koran. If Muslims want to practice Islam, that's
their business but when we (a supposed Christian nation) are shedding
our blood to defend their right to demean the most important doctrine
of Christianity – its time to rethink our position and wonder why
God allowed us to get in this mess in the first place.
back
to top
|